Woodard v. STP Corp., 11th Cir. 1999, 170 F.3d 1043
Ex parte Tarpley, Ala. 1974, 293 Ala. 137, 300 So. 2d 409
DeLoach v. Mayer Elec. Supply Co., Ala. 1979, 378 So. 2d 733
Waldrop v. Peabody Galion Corp., Ala. 1982, 423 So. 2d 733
Glover v. Silent Hoist & Crane Co., Inc., N.D. Ala. 1979, 471 F. Supp. 457
General Motors v. Edwards, Ala. 1985, 482 So. 2d 1176, 54 USLW 2356
Tapley v. Liberty Super Markets of Birmingham, Ala. Crim. App. 1974, 53 Ala. App. 363, 300 So. 2d 401
Enoch v. Firestone Tire & Rubber Co., Ala. 1988, 534 So. 2d 266
Michael Barnes v. Birmingham International Raceway Inc., Ala. 1989, 551 So. 2d 929
Beville v. Spencer, Ala. 1990, 568 So. 2d 1224
Arthur Young, Inc. v. Arthur Young & Co., N.D. Ala. 1983, 579 F. Supp. 384, 224 U.S.P.Q. 166
Ritchie v. Bridgestone/Firestone, Ala. 1993, 621 So. 2d 288
Pitts v. Beasley, Ala. 1997, 706 So. 2d 711
American States Ins. Co. v. Lanier Business Products, M.D. Ala. 1989, 707 F. Supp. 494
Reynolds v. Bridgestone/Firestone, 11th Cir. 1993, 989 F.3d 465
Arthur Young, Inc. v. Arthur Young & Co., 579 F. Supp. 384 (N.D. Ala. 1983)
The firm successfully represented Arthur Young, Inc., a national “big Eight” accounting firm that was also engaged in the business of executive search and recruitment, in this declaratory judgment filed against it by an executive search firm whose president and sole shareholder was named Arthur Young. We filed a counterclaim seeking a declaration that plaintiff’s use of “Arthur Young” infringed as well as diluted our client’s trademark rights under federal and Alabama law. After a bench trial, the court entered a judgment and permanent injunction in favor of our client.